|
|
Exploring Intaglio:Etching and Aquatint on Copper Plates |
For my project, I worked with two different intaglio printmaking techniques – etching and aquatint – on copper plates. The purpose of my project was to determine the best mordant (Ferric Chloride or Nitric Acid) for creating certain visual effects (line and tone). The copper plates and a hard ground were my constants, while I varied the acid used as well as the time each plate spent in the acid baths. I measured the effects of the reaction between the acid and the copper visually through making prints. My final goal was to produce a work of printed art to demonstrate my scientific conclusions regarding the etching and aquatint processes.
Aquating and etching are forms of intaglio printmaking. The word intaglio is derived from the Italian word "intagliare," which meants "to carve or cut into." An etching is a type of print that produces lines as acid bites into the parts of the plate that are not covered by an acid resistant ground. The aquatint method is used to create tonal effects from the acid biting into open areas not covered by either rosin or spray paint and received its name from the Latin word "aquafortis," meaning "strong water," and the Italian word "tinto," which means "tone."
Surprisingly, the history of printmaking did not begin with the invention of the printing press. There are, in fact, records of engravings made 3,000 years ago from bone on carved into cave walls. Printmaking, initially only used as a way to communicate, was not actually considered an art form until the late eighteenth century. The art of printmaking has been developed through the years, and using Ferric Chloride to etch Copper plates is actually a newer technique than using Nitric Acid as the mordant, which is why I chose to compare the effects these two etchants have on Copper plates.
HYPOTHESIS: Before I began this project, I hypothesized that the Ferric Chloride would produce a more controlled line than the Nitric Acid. I had never worked with Ferric Chloride before, but I had worked with Nitric Acid (on zinc plates, though) in a previous lab this semester.
Materials:
Copper Plates
Putz Pomade
Steel Wool
Paper Towels
Mineral Spirits
Isopropyl Alcohol
Stop Out Varnish
Hard Ground
Stylus
3 Molar Nitric Acid
5.2 Molar Nitric Acid
Ferric Chloride
Tweezers
Acid Trays (large enough to fit plates)
Timer
Goggles and Rubber Gloves
Rosin
Hotplate
Charbonelle Paint: Van Dyck Brown, Ultramarine Blue, Black
Paper
Press
Part One: Preparing Plates

Part Two: Etching Lines with Nitric Acid and Ferric Chloride
NOTE: All work with acids should take place under the hood. Goggles must be on at all times; wearing rubber gloves is suggested. Also, observations should be recorded throughout the entire experiment.
Part Three: Making Prints of Etched Lines
Part Four: Using Aquatint to Experiment With Tone
Part Five: Using Conclusions to Create a Work of Art
Etching Lines With Nitric Acid:
| Plate | Preparation | In Acid | Plate | |
| 3m Test Plate 1, side 1 | no visible reactions | Could barely see the lines. No big difference between three and nine minutes, which is why I decided to etch lines on the other side (same face) of the plate using longer time intervals. |
see below | |
| 3m Test Plate 1, side 2 | Ground is much thinner, a very light brown as opposed to the almost black color of the ground I used for the first test. Some ground came off when I put the ruler down to draw the straight line. | no visible reactions | Lines are still very faint, but they are visible. |
Lines barely visible; easier to see some of the lines that were left over from previous use than the lines I created. |
| 5.3m Test Plate 1 | When I made the solution, it produced heat, which means I witnessed an exothermic reaction between the Nitric Acid and water. The ground is very thin. |
5 minutes: A few bubbles to brush away when I first dropped
it in. When removing the plate with the tweezers, some of the ground
came off, so I covered that area with stop out. |
etchings all over, even in places they shouldn’t be. Big difference between the lines etched before and after 10 minutes. The lines after 10 minutes bit much deeper.
|
The first time I printed this plate, almost no lines appeared. The second time, however, turned out much better. There is an obvious increase in darkness of the lines. The longer the plate was in the bath, the deeper the bite. When the bite is deeper it holds ink much easier. I might be having problems with these prints because the paint is a little too runny, so it is probably not sticking to the plate as well as it should.
|
| 5.3m Test Plate 2 | I used a thicker application of the ground (3 swoops of the brush), which made a big difference in terms of lowering the amount of random biting occurring over the plate. |
no visible reactions | All lines are visible; it is obvious that the lines etched for 35 minutes were bit much deeper into the plate than the lines etched for less time. | I made two prints of this plate, and neither turned out very well. Perhaps this was because the paper was too wet. The lines before 15 minutes are barely visible. There is an obvious increase in thickness and darkness from 15 to 35 minutes. As time increases, the line also gets much fuzzier. |
Etching Lines With Ferric Chloride:
| Plate | In Acid | Plate | |
| Ferric Chloride Test Plate | The Ferric Chloride is a dark yellow color, which makes it very difficult to notice any reactions occurring while the plate is in the bath. | ![]() |
I made two prints of this plate; the first did not turn out at all, probably because the paper was too wet. The second print, however, turned out well. As time increases, the line becomes darker, but does not increase in thickness like it did in the Nitric Acid solution. The part of the plate that was in the acid for fifteen minutes looks the best out of everything tested.
|
Exploring Aquatint Using Ferric Chloride:
| Plate | Preparation | In Acid | Plate | |
| Aquatint Test Strip 1 | I used spray paint as the method for this plate. | no visible reactions | There is no visible difference in tone among the different sections of the plate. | No visible difference in tone. One minute is probably not long enough, so I decided to make another test strip. There is also a yellowish tint on part of the print. |
Aquatint Test Strip 2 |
I used spray paint as the method for this plate, and am noticing that it is very difficult to create an even tone across the plate with the paint. | no visible reactions | There is only a slight difference in tone among the different sections of the plate. | No visible difference in tone where it should be. There are darker sploches throughout the middle of the print, but these have nothing to do with the amount of time spent in the acid. Three minutes is probably still too short, so I decided to do another test strip. |
| Aquatint Plate | I used spray paint for this plate. | no visible reactions | ![]() |
This print turned out well. There is a very significant difference in tone. The acid bit well into the plate over the fifteen minute period.
|
| Aquatint Test Strip 3 | The spray paint was not working well, so I decided to use rosin, which I found to be much easier to control. When I heated the plate the rosin became more red than yellow.
|
no visible reactions | It is easy to see the difference in tone among the different sections of the plate, especially between 7 and 15 minutes.
|
The rosin works much better than the spray paint. The test strip turned out well. The most significant difference is between 7 and 15 minutes.
|
Creating a Work of Art:
| Plate | In Acid | Plate | |
| Work of Art | My design was very detailed, so I had to use a brush to brush away
the precipitate that formed during the etching, so it would not fall
into the lines.
When the plate was in the Nitric Acid during the aquatint step, there was a clear visible reaction. The plate appeared blue and bubbles formed. I had to constantly brush the plate. When I removed the plate from the bath, I could feel the exothermic reaction occuring between the plate and the acid; I could also hear the bubbles forming on the plate. |
After the etching the lines seemed rather rough and some had some gaps in them. Perhaps this was due to sediment gathering in the lines? The difference in tone is evident among the areas that were in the acid for different lengths of time. I stopped experimenting with tone after two minutes because the lines were starting to fade.
|
I made a total of four prints. Three with 20 parts Ultramarine blue and one part black, and one that also had green and Brown Van Dyck. The prints all turned out well and you can notice the difference in tone. When applying ink, I found it helpful (although unorthodox) to go back in with my fingers and apply ink to places where maybe the acid did not bite far enough down.
|

Through my experiment, I found that the plates
etched in the Ferric Chloride solution for fifteen minutes produced the best
(most controlled, while still dark) lines. Looking at the image above, this
conclusion is obvious. The print to the left was etched with Ferric Chloride.
It’s
lines are much more aesthetically appealing than those created by Nitric Acid,
plus they hold ink much better without being as fuzzy. Furthermore, it took
less than half the amount of time for the Ferric Chloride to etch these lines
than it did for the Nitric Acid. Chemically, I know that the ferrous
ions from the Ferric Chloride solution react with the solid copper, and it is
this reaction that causes the copper to be oxidized to form cupric ions, thus
creating the "bite" into the copper:
The two half reactions:
2 Fe3+ + 2 e- → 2 Fe2+
and
Cu (0) → Cu2+ + 2 e-
form the whole reaction:
2 Fe3+ + Cu (0) → 2 Fe2+ + Cu2+
* The Copper loses electrons and is therefore oxidized, which visually appears
as the acid biting into the plate.
Both acids produced aesthetically pleasing aquatints, but I found the 6 molar Nitric Acid combined with the rosin method to be the most efficient way to produce tonal effects. The rosin is much easier to control than the spray paint and the Nitric Acid bites into the copper much faster than the Ferric Chloride. Like when the Ferric Chloride reacted with the Copper, the Nitric Acid also causes the the Copper to be oxidized from 0 to +2, which is evident in the equation: 3Cu + 8HNO3 --> 3Cu (NO3)2 + 2NO + 4H2O
Throughout the course of this project I found myself dealing with artistic obstacles that got in the way of my scientific experiment. The possibility for human error is very high in printmaking, but I have learned that sometimes errors lead to more interesting prints! Despite my many errors, however, I did find my hypothesis to be correct, and I did stick to my original plan, which was to create a work of art encompassing all that I had learned about the etching and aquatint processes. I was happy to find a use for both acids in my final work of art, which proves the point that each acid bites into the plates differently, and therefore creates unique effects, which is what I was hoping to conclude from this project.
http://artmondo.net/printworks/articles/ferric.htm
http://www.sewanee.edu/chem/Chem&Art/default.html
http://science.jrank.org/pages/2515/Engraving-Etching-Origins-history-intaglio-printing.html
Ross, John, Clare Romano, and Tim Ross. The Complete Printmaker: Techniques, Traditions, Innovations. The Free Press; 1990.
I would like to thank Ms. Carolyn Fitz for all of her help. Without her printmaking knowledge and extreme patience, this project would not have been possible!