|
|
Dye Absorption in Abaca Pulp as a Function of Beating TimeAlison Reynolds |
For my project, I originally wanted to dye both wool and paper with the same dye and compare the results using the colorimeter. But as Dr. Bordley explained, it takes a different kind of dye to dye wool than it does for paper, so there would be no point in trying to compare materials that were dyed with different types of dye (too many variables!). Since I reallly wanted to work with paper, Dr. Bordley suggested that I dye pulp that had been beaten for different times and test dye absorption as a function of beating time. We all remember the first paper making lab where we recorded the drainage time of denim for different beating times; the beating time of pulp has an effect on the overall quality of the pulp, drainage time, quality of paper, etc., so I figured that testing dye absorption as a function of beating time would yield discernible results.
As pulp is beaten, it begins to fray and break, creating branchings called fibrils and small, free pieces of fiber which are called fines. Fibrils and fines are the main reason that drainage time increases as the beating time of pulp increases; the fines and fibrils absorb excess water. My hypothesis is that the longer the pulp is beaten, the more dye it will absorb because the fines and fibrils that result from prolonged beating increase the surface area of the fiber, allowing it to absorb more dye. Dyeing pulp is not the same as dyeing wool; with wool we used acid dyes, which the wool exhausted. Pulp requires cotton dyes, which do not exhaust, and therefore the time left in the dye bath is a factor rather than the percent of exhaustion of the dye bath. There are several factors in this experiment; I varied the beating time of the pulp. Other factors, controlled in this experiment, include:
Materials Needed:
Procedure:
1. Weigh close to 1/2 pound of dry abaca fiber (in this case, 257 g)
2. Beat for 60 minutes at a setting of 2, gathering 150 mL samples every 10 minutes (i.e., there are 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 minute samples)
3. Prepare the dye bath:
a. heat to above 52 degrees C (I kept at a steady temperature of 60 degrees C)
b. add 5 g NaCl
c. add 10 mL dye
d. add pulp and let the dye bath/pulp sit on heat for 10 minutes, stir frequently
e. Remove pulp from dye bath: pour into a funnel lined with filter paper so that the dye bath drains into a clean beaker
f. Add 20 mL dye activator to the dye bath
g. replace the pulp into the solution
h. Let stand on heat for 60 minutes; keep at a constant temperature of 60 degrees C
i. Remove from heat and let stand overnight; make sure to cover each beaker with Saran wrap!
4. Rinse the dye: set up a funnel lined with filter paper over a clean beaker, and run 300 mL of water through the pulp; repeat until water drains colorless
5. Dilute the pulp with water to 250 mL
6. Make a wafer of paper from the pulp:
a. Using a wire screen as a mold, a tin can as a deckle, a funnel and a graduated cylinder, pour the diluted pulp solution through the tin can. When it stops draining, remove the tin can and couch the wafer onto a moist pelon. Cover with another pelon and several felts. Roll gently with a "rolling pin" (a 2 L bottle of water) to remove excess water. Remove the felts and pelons, and gently transfer the wafer of pulp from the pelon to a drying board.
Lovely picture of me performing step 6
7. Dry the wet wafers with a heat gun.
8. Measure with colorimeter.
Observations and Data
Observations
Inital Samples
| Sample 1 (10 minutes) | Fairly lumpy; beige at bottom of beaker but white at top; difficult to swirl; thick consistency |
| Sample 2 (20 minutes) | A bit thinner in texture, but still lumpy; same coloration; difficult to swirl; similarly thick consistency |
| Sample 3 (30 minutes) | Thinner in texture; same coloration; easier to swirl; thinner consistency |
| Sample 4 (40 minutes) | Thinner in texture (few lumps), and more uniform; swirls easily; same coloration; similar consistency to Sample 3 |
| Sample 5 (50 minutes) | Much more uniform in texture (only very small lumps); swirls very easily; same coloration, but cloudy; thin consistency |
| Sample 6 (60 minutes) | No lumps; same coloration; very cloudy; very easy to swirl; thin, uniform consistency; small bubbles visible |
While dyeing
| Sample 1 | Pulp appears more solid; comes off of the filter paper fairly easily; dye bath is bright red |
| Sample 2 | Pulp appears solid; removed from filter paper easily; dye bath is bright red (appears the same as sample 1) |
| Sample 3 | Pulp appears more liquid; some of it sticks to filter paper; dye bath is bright red (appears the same as the other samples) |
| Sample 4 | Pulp appears even more liquid; hard to remove from filter paper; filter paper tears more easily; dye bath is same color as the other samples; took longer for dye bath to drain (before adding dye activator) than the other samples |
| Sample 5 | Pulp appears more liquid; difficult to remove from filter paper; filter paper tears easily; dye bath is same color as other samples; took even longer for dye bath to drain than the other samples; gets hot very easily, no matter where it is placed on the hot plate |
| Sample 6 | Pulp is much finer, more liquid; ;very difficult to remove from filter paper; filter paper tears easily; dye bath is same color as other samples; took very long for dye bath to drain; also heats easily and quickly, no matter where it is placed on the hot plate |
![]() |
![]() |
During Rinsing
Sample |
Rinse 1 |
Rinse 2 |
Rinse 3 |
Rinse 4 |
1 |
Drains slowly; pulp still bright red; drained water is still bright red; fairly easy to remove pulp from filter paper; filter paper is bright red | Drains slowly; water appears more colorless (a light red, almost orange); pulp appears more orange; fairly easy to remove pulp from filter paper; filter paper is red-orange | Drains slowly; drained water is much more colorless, it is a light coral color; pulp even orange-er; easier to remove pulp from filter paper; filter paper is barely dyed, only a bit of orange where the pulp sat | Drains slowly; water is colorless!; pulp the same orange color; easy to remove from filter paper; filter paper not colored |
2 |
Also drains slowly; pulp still bright red; drained water is still bright red; had a little accident with the filter paper: I was repositioning the filter paper and it broke, most of the pulp fell into the drained water, and I had to repeat the process; filter paper is bright red | Also draining slowly and more clearly; color of pulp appears red-orange; pulp still fairly easy to remove from filter paper; filter paper is also red-orange | Drains slowly; drained water is darker than sample 1, but still a dark coral color; easier to remove pulp from filter paper; filter paper also barely dyed a light orange; pulp is even more orange | Drains slowly; water is colorless!; pulp is still the same orange color, fairly easy to remove from filter paper; filter paper not colored |
3 |
Draining slowly; pulp bright red; drained water still bright red; a bit more difficult to remove pulp from filter paper, but I remained accident free; filter paper is bright red | Also draining more slowly; water appears more colorless than the other samples; pulp is orange; pulp is more difficult to remove from filter paper; filter paper is red-orange | Drains slowly; drained water is very light coral; easy to remove pulp from filter paper; filter paper dyed a very light orange where the pulp sat | Drains slowly; water is colorless; pulp is still orange; a bit more difficult to remove from filter paper than previous samples; filter paper is not colored |
4 |
Seems to be draining faster; pulp still bright red; drained water still bright red; hard to remove from filter paper; filter paper is bright re |
Water drains very slowly; drained water is darker red-orange than previous samples; pulp is dark orange and a bit difficult to remove from filter paper; filter paper is dark orange-red |
Drains slowly; water is a very light pink; easy to remove pulp from filter paper; filter paper barely colored, only a bit of light orange where the pulp sat; pulp is orange | Drains slowly; water is colorless; pulp is orange; more difficult to remove from filter paper than previous samples; filter paper is not colored |
5 |
Drains more slowly; pulp still bright red; drained water appears a bit less colorless, but still red; difficult to remove pulp from filter paper; filter paper is bright red | Water drains very slowly; drained water is a light orange; pulp is orange; pulp is difficult to remove from filter paper; filter paper is a light orange-red | Drains very slowly; water is a very, very ligtht pink/coral; easy to remove pulp from filter paper; filter paper barely colored, just a light orange tint where the pulp sat | Drains slowly; water is colorless; pulp is orange; fairly easy to remove from filter paper, although more difficult than previous samples; filter paper is not colored |
6 |
Drains very slowly; pulp still bright red; drained water still bright red ; pulp very difficult to remove from filter paper; filter paper is bright red | Water drains very slowly; drained water is still dark red; pulp is dark red-orange; pulp is very difficult to remove from the filter paper; filter paper is a dark red-orange | Water drains extremely slowly; water is a light coral color; easy to remove pulp from filter paper; filter paper barely colored, just a light orange spot where the pulp sat | Water drains very, very slowly; pulp still orange; still a bit difficult to remove from filter paper; filter paper is not colored |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Data
Colorimeter Readings
| Sample |
L*a*b* |
Munsell |
1 |
60.67 +36.94 +35.48 |
9.4 R 6.0/9.8 |
2 |
59.11 +39.45 +34.08 |
8.6 R 5.8/10.2 |
3 |
60.05 +40.90 +39.97 |
9.5 R 5.9/10.9 |
4 |
60.04 +37.48 +30.42 |
8.1 R 5.9/9.4 |
5 |
59.40 +36.95 +30.21 |
8.2 R 5.8/9.3 |
6 |
56.31 +40.01 +32.76 |
8.2 R 5.5/10.1 |
Conclusions
As the colorimeter values show, there is no discernible pattern in the readings. There are several explanations for this. There is the possibility that beating time has no effect on dye absorption. There are, however, several variables involved in this experiment, only one of which (the beating time of the pulp) I varied. Although I tried to keep the others controlled, there is the possibility that I accidentally allowed them to vary slightly from sample to sample. For example, the amount of dye or dye activator may have varied very slightly between the samples, as they were measured with the colorimeter, but these variances are so slight that it doesn't seem that they would make a difference.
Based on the results of the colorimeter readings, I would suggest that an impatient artist may dye paper with a shorter beating time with the same results as pulp with a longer beating time. The pulp with the longer beating time, however, creates a better quality paper.
http://www.prochemical.com/directions/MX_PaperPulp.htm
I would like to thank Dr. Bordley for giving me the idea for the project and providing information and supplies on dyeing pulp. I would also like to thank Nassrin el-Gosi for taking pictures!