|
|
Fiber IdentificationElizabeth Garfield |
In this series of experiment I will develop a system of fabric identification through burn tests, staining, and microscope analysis. I will be testing five different types of fabric, three natural and two synthetic; cotton, silk, wool, Dacron 64 (polyester), and Viscose (rayon). I will test my results, and try to classify six different fabrics on an unknown multi-fiber strip. I will be using Textile ID Stains, and multi fiber fabric from Testfabrics, Inc. In my experiment I will use TIS #1, #3A, and #4, along with mulitfiber fabric #43. In the stain test, the stains will act as the variable, while the fibers are constant. In the burn test the fibers will act as the variable.
There are many different types of fibers, created and used with many different purposes. All fibers can be put into two main categories, natural and synthetic. This will be one of the categories I use to define my unknown samples. TIS #3A, and #4 are best to identify synthetic fibers; #1 is best for natural fibers. Before and after I stain the fibers I will use the colorimeter to test the L*a*b* coordinates of the color. The L* corresponds to the lightness of the color, the a* with the red/green attributes, and the b* with the yellow/blue attributes. This will allow me to get an exact color of the fabrics, and then be able to compare how the known fibers reacted to the dyes, as well as the unknown fibers.
Burn Tests
Supplies
Repeat with each different fabric sample.
Stain
Supplies
Stain #1
Stain #3A
Stain #4
Microscope
Burn Test
| Fabric | Flame | Smell | Ash |
| Cotton | steady orange flame | burning leaves | very crumbly, falls apart easily |
| Silk | rapidly burns, uneven flame | burning hair | very brittle |
| Wool | hard to light, wouldn't stay lit, | burning hair | very hard, stuck to the fiber sample |
Polyester |
won't light, fibers melt and stick to the sample, black smoke | burning plastic, slightly sweet | no ash is created, the fibers curl back |
| Rayon | steady, rapid orange flame | burning leaves | no ash present |
Stain Test
| Fabric | Unstained | Stain #1 | Stain #3A | Stain #4 |
| Cotton | matte white, feels rough | white with a light blue tint | white, slightly darker than unstained | off white, slightly darker than unstained |
| Silk | off white, slightly yellow, very smooth | light violet | light taupe, off white | light taupe |
| Wool | fibers in weave are coarse, rough to run finger across | raspberry | dark taupe | light grape |
Polyester |
white, silky, easy to caress with finger | white | off white | off white, slightly orange tinted |
| Rayon | white, finger skips when trying to run it across fabric | shiny white | shiny white | shiny white |
Stained Multi-fiber strips
| Labeled Unstained |
![]() |
Unstained |
#1 | #3A | #4 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
L*a*b* results
Unstained Fibers
| Fabric | L* | a* | b* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cotton | 97.24 | +0.70 | +0.31 |
| Silk | 93.93 | +0.69 | +5.76 |
| Wool | 87.77 | -0.71 | +7.15 |
Polyester |
96.54 | +0.74 | -0.80 |
| Rayon | 92.19 | +0.01 | +0.19 |
Stain #1
| Fabric | L* | a* | b* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cotton | 88.87 | -1.27 | -0.39 |
| Silk | 77.68 | +8..68 | -5.78 |
| Wool | 75.25 | +18.13 | +3.06 |
Polyester |
90.38 | -0.66 | +1.49 |
| Rayon | 89.76 | -0.27 | +0.81 |
Stain #3A
| Fabric | L* | a* | b* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cotton | 87.87 | -.055 | +.093 |
| Silk | 82.36 | -1.36 | +5.82 |
| Wool | 79.75 | -2.92 | +9.71 |
Polyester |
87.50 | -1.36 | +2.75 |
| Rayon | 86.86 | -1.09 | +3.05 |
Stain #4
| Fabric | L* | a* | b* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cotton | 86.65 | +0.12 | +8.84 |
| Silk | 76.27 | +4.83 | +11.29 |
| Wool | 66.41 | +8.37 | +10.88 |
Polyester |
84.22 | +2.64 | +14.68 |
| Rayon | 86.00 | +0.68 | +7.08 |
Microscope Pictures
| Cotton | Silk | Wool |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Polyester | Rayon |
![]() |
![]() |
Unknown Strip
Burn Test
| Strip # | Flame | Smell | Ash | Similar Fibers |
| 1 | steady orange | burning hair | black ash, easily broken apart, brown at the end of the fibers | wool, silk |
| 2 | rapid orange | slightly sweet, burning hair | black, hard, and brittle | silk |
| 3 | wont light, melts | no distinct smell | black and sticky | synthetic |
4 |
slow orange | sweet | melts, rolls back, black | polyester |
| 5 | rapid, enveloping orange | wood | very little ash | synthetic |
| 6 | rapid | wood | melts and drips | synthetic |
Stain Test
| Strip # | Unstained | Stain #1 | Stain #3A | Stain #4 | Similar Fibers |
| 1 | light taupe in color, weave feels rough | raspberry color | taupe, slightly darker than unstained | light grape | wool |
| 2 | white, weave feels ribbed | white, slightly darker than unstained | hot pink | very light baby pink | synthetic |
| 3 | white, similar feeling to #2, easier to run fingers across | white, slightly darker than unstained | white, same as unstained | off white, slightly darker than unstained | |
4 |
white, soft feeling, nearly fuzzy | dark orange/rose | light blue/green | grape purple | |
| 5 | white, coarse, harsh to the touch, finger skips across fibers, rather than glides | white with a very slight blue tint | bright white, same as unstained | off white, slightly darker than unstained | cotton |
| 6 | white and shiny, fingers run easily across fibers, almost slippery | light yellow | very light pink | peach |
Stained Multi-fiber strips
| Unstained | #1 | #3A | #4 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
L*a*b* Results
Unstained Fibers
| Strip | L* | a* | b* |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 92.72 | -0.64 | +9.73 |
| 2 | 98.33 | +0.47 | +0.20 |
| 3 | 97.14 | +0.68 | -0.69 |
4 |
96.01 | +0.82 | -0.75 |
| 5 | 97.20 | +0.60 | -1.35 |
| 6 | 95.54 | +0.24 | -1.81 |
Stain #1
| Strip | L* | a* | b* |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 72.4 | +17.68 | +1.90 |
| 2 | 92.85 | -0.71 | +1.66 |
| 3 | 93.58 | -0.87 | +2.14 |
4 |
72.50 | +15.16 | +9.22 |
| 5 | 90.01 | -1.85 | -0.22 |
| 6 | 95.47 | -4.09 | +10.11 |
Stain #3A
| Strip # | L* | a* | b* |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 76.75 | -2.71 | +11.24 |
| 2 | 79.41 | +40.27 | -1.11 |
| 3 | 87.88 | -1.72 | +3.47 |
4 |
70.43 | -9.16 | +5.62 |
| 5 | 88.66 | -0.65 | +0.14 |
| 6 | 83.91 | +19.04 | +2.75 |
Stain #4
| Strip # | L* | a* | b* |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 61.28 | +9.40 | +9.76 |
| 2 | 84.44 | +7.13 | +5.60 |
| 3 | 84.08 | +2.75 | +15.18 |
4 |
51.12 | +6.69 | +3.41 |
| 5 | 86.77 | -0.38 | +7.98 |
| 6 | 79.79 | +11.15 | +29.73 |
Microscope Pictures
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| 4 | 5 | 6 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
After analyzing the burn tests, stain tests and the microscope pictures, I have been able to label the unknown fibers as follows:
| 1 | wool |
| 2 | acrylic |
| 3 | unknown-synthetic |
| 4 | nylon |
| 5 | cotton |
| 6 | spun diacetate |
The known multifiber strip included fibers other than those that I focused on in my tests. Using the stain test results I was able to use these other fibers in identifying the unknown samples.
If I could do more with this project I would go back and do further tests on the fibers I have predicted to be one of the unknowns, but did not focus on in my project, such as acrylic, nylon and spun diacetate. I would also test other fibers to try and identify the still unknown, #3.
Dr. Bordley
Dr. Bachman
Miranda Klaas of Testfabrics, Inc.